The Theory of Knowledge - 1372 Words

â€Å"That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.† We live in a strange and puzzling world. Despite the exponential growth of knowledge in the past century, we are faced by a baffling multitude of conflicting ideas. The mass of conflicting ideas causes the replacement of knowledge, as one that was previously believed to be true gets replace by new idea. This is accelerated by the rapid development of technology to allow new investigations into knowledge within the areas of human and natural sciences. Knowledge in the human sciences has been replaced for decades as new discoveries by the increased study of humans, and travel has caused the discarding of a vast array of theories. The development of†¦show more content†¦By looking up at the sky at night Olber wondered why the sky is dark if the number of stars was infinite. Using his sense perception and reason, Olber was able to deduce that Newton’s model must have been wrong if the sky got dark at night. On the contrary, as the natural sciences being largely based on the perceptions of our environment as well as reasoning, our perception can sometimes deceive us, but is also selective and can be distorted by our beliefs and prejudices. Olber’s observation of the night sky gave him the evidence that there were a finite number of stars, with only observation there is an uncertainty to the accuracy of the paradox and whether this was only true with the way Olber perceived it. Due to the possibility of assumptions in reasoning, for example, using inductive reasoning to explain the darkness of the sky everywhere, by assuming that because the sky is dark at night on Earth it must be so everywhere. However inductive reasoning is flawed as it assumes the observed to be the all the unobserved, and we are therefore making hasty generalisations on the basis of insufficient evidence. How can we know whether Olber’s paradox was not simply due to other unexplained phenomena in physic s? On the other hand, we cannot know whether Olber’s paradox was due to other unexplained phenomena of physics and must therefore require the development of knew knowledge to disprove it. The knowledge shown to be wrong by Olber however wasShow MoreRelatedThe Theory of Knowledge912 Words   |  4 PagesTheory of Knowledge 5. The historians task is to understand the past; the human scientist by contrast, is looking to change the future. To what extent is this true in these areas of knowledge? Life is too short for any individual to make every mistake. We use history to learn where we come from and what caused events of the past to occur. It is important for us to have a strong and in depth understanding of what caused events such as the Renaissance all the way up to World War Two. CreatingRead MoreTheory of Knowledge2963 Words   |  12 Pagesways does the biological constitution of a living organism determine, influence or limit its sense perception? B) If humans are sensitive only to certain ranges of stimuli, what consequences or limitations might this have for the acquisition of knowledge? Ans-A- The biological constitution of a living organism has a mammoth influence on the sense perception of an organism. The biological institution of an organism can even enhance or degrade the level, degree and method of sense perception by anRead MoreThe Theory Of Knowledge And The Reliability Theory1162 Words   |  5 PagesIn this paper, I will argue that the Justified Belief theory (JTB), when comparing to the Reliability theory of Knowledge, is flawed and thus not being the stronger theory of the two. The JTB Theory of Knowledge and the Reliability Theory of knowledge are different in how they present themselves. I will show the counter arguments of JTB which further show the flaws in the theory. Firstly, the Justified Belief Theory of Knowledge is defined as follows S knows that P if and only if (1) S believesRead MoreEssay on Theory Of Knowledge1523 Words   |  7 PagesTheory Of Knowledge In today’s society, science is regarded as being the most trusted form of knowledge, leading to many claiming it to be the supreme form of knowledge. To investigate whether or not this is justified we must compare science to other forms/areas of knowledge and consider what they each contribute. The strongest argument science has to claim this title, is the objectivity and empirical nature of its method and in particular its verifying processes;Read MoreInternalism Theory of Knowledge1183 Words   |  5 PagesInternalism is one of the epistemic theories of knowledge and is explained as the effects that cause beliefs to be justified or unjustified. They are called J- factors and they must in some way, be internal to the subject. The best way to internalize J-Factors is to limit them to beliefs. The constraint internalists place on J-Factors is more plausibly constructed in terms of intellectual convenience. What meets the requirements as a J-factor must be something that is cognitively easily reached toRead MoreTheory of Knowledge Essay637 Words   |  3 Pages To what extent might lack of knowledge be an excuse for unethical conduct? Theory of Knowledge Essay Word Count: Candidate # There are certain â€Å"Areas of Knowledge (AoK)† type of knowledge questions within the subject of ethics that could be considered quite debatable rather than easily being verified with a concluding idea within a short amount of time. Knowledge questions such as â€Å"To what extent might lack of knowledge be an excuse for unethical conduct?† for the AoK topicRead MoreThe Theory Of Knowledge And Power1131 Words   |  5 PagesPost-Foucauldian theory of knowledge and power, knowledge has been used as a synonym for power. In 21st century they are considered as two sides of the same coin. Power gives an individual the ability to make others obey in a social relationship irrespective of the basis. As per Foucault power is not only brutal physical force rather an invisible form of network that operates. At times, the operator has no knowledge of this invisible power which controls others. Similarly, knowledge is defined as aRead MoreThe Theory Of Knowledge Year1685 Words à ‚  |  7 PagesSabrina Dixon Farrell Theory of Knowledge Year 1 22 January 2016 â€Å"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence†. Do you agree? Evidence is typically described something that tends to prove or disprove something, or are used as the grounds for a belief or ideal. It can be assumed that all ideals have some sort of basis, even if that basis includes no evidence to back its claim. It is a claim with the basis of verbal word. And yet, Hitchens claims that through havingRead MoreThe Theory Of Knowledge Essay1699 Words   |  7 PagesTheory of knowledge essay To what extent do the concepts we use shape the conclusions that we reach? Since my childhood I have always been told ‘Education is the key to success!’ and there is absolutely no other way to achieving beyond more than just survival in this fast-paced but deeply cruel and competitive world. That was a concept endlessly hammered into my head by society, it however never appealed to me simply because of the fact that I found it a concept, something which according to theRead MoreTheory of Knowledge Tools2154 Words   |  9 Pages In order to address this we would be looking at: perception and reason as tools in the pursuit of knowledge using the natural sciences and religion. Also, it would be interesting to look at how these TOK tools can have alternative uses; using the same tool with different techniques (i.e. AOK’s) and how sometimes the old tool needs to be swapped with a newer and efficient one apply to our knowledge issue. The world that we live in is a very complicated one. There are many things happening at any